Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Bibliography

Bibliography
-----------------

1.David Harvey, “Limits on Capital”

2.David Harvey, “MEGACITIES LECTURE 4”

3.David Harvey, “A Brief History of Neoliberalism” (2005)

4.David Harvey, “Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development” (2006)

5.Saskia Sassen, “Locating cities on global circuits”

6.Saskia Sassen, “Cities in a world economy”
7.Henry Lefebvre, “The Production of Space”

8.Neil Brenner, “The Urbanisation of Neoliberalism: Theoretical debates”

9.Manuel Castells, “The Urban Question. A Marxist Approach”

10.MICHAEL GOLDMAN, "Speculative Urbanism and the Making of the Next World City"

11. Ruth Meinzen-Dick and Meyra Mendoza, "Alternative Water Allocation Mechanisms: Indian and International Experiences"
Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31, No. 13 (Mar. 30, 1996), pp. A25

12.Caroline A. Sullivan*, Alasdair Cohen**, Jean-Marc Faurès** & Guido Santini** FAO "The Rural Water Livelihoods Index "

13. http://www.unesco.org/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr3/pdf/08_WWDR3_overview_of_key_msgs.pdf

14. The World Development Report 2009 ‘reshapes economic geography’: geographical reflections
Jonathan Rigg*, Anthony Bebbington**, Katherine V Gough † , Deborah F Bryceson ‡ , Jytte Agergaard † , Niels Fold † and Cecilia Tacoli ††

15. 4-5 reports on WWDR related to resource constraint ( Water)

Friday, October 7, 2011

Rationale for new Urban Growth

Looking at overall New Urbanisation

Rationale


  1. Rural-urban transformations are best facilitated when policy makers recognize the economic interdependence among settlements. Within a country’s hierarchy of cities, towns, and villages, each specializes in a different function and has
    strong interrelationships with others

    The rationale for this is that, the State level Government should drive the policy for this type of urbanisation and Centre play the role of giving overall direction. There is no role of ULB

  2. Prioritizing and sequencing of policies can help governments facilitate inclusive urbanization even in the early stages of development. For less urbanised areas- build density and reduce economic distance with spatially connective infrastructure. More more Urbnisized areas- build density, overcome distance, and address the economic and social divisions

  3. Policy challenges become more complex with urbanization. Cities and towns provide fi rms and families the benefits of proximity, but the compactness of activity produces congestion, pollution, and social tension, which can offset those benefits.

Looking at Regional Development

Building integrated neighborhoods: a framework

The “thickness” of country borders is a selfimposed obstacle to development, with isolation increasing the economic distance to markets. Therefore, reduce the border thickness and connect Globally.

But most of the institutions or infrastructure needed to connect a region to the global economy are public goods, requiring collective action to overcome coordination problems and externalities

Three types of policy instruments for regional integration

  • Institutional cooperation

    • Reforms needed- legal system for equity investments, property rights, regulation, taxes, fi nance, infrastructure, corruption, and macroeconomic stability

    • Central Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, whose international competitiveness is seriously affected by high transport costs, are now exploring corridor approaches that have worked well elsewhere, as in Southeastern Europe

  • Regional infrastructure - reduce transport costs and connect it to global market.

    • Electricity, water, telephone lines, and Internet access all raise productivity but are severely inadequate in many developing regions .

    • Mobility-enhancing regional infrastructure – roads

    • Trade-enhancing regional infrastructure-

  • Coordinated incentives involving all the neighborhood’s stakeholders and donors from the leading world markets can promote factor mobility

    • Coordinated incentives can address market failures and disputes between countries in a

      regional association Example- The Central American Common Market, created in 1960 by El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, faced periodic complaints about redistributing benefi ts to Honduras and Nicaragua.


Corridor Development

Investments in cross-country infrastructure to connect regional markets.

This is fundamentally different from, the regional development. Corridor Development envisions to create new uban centers with greater density rather than spread the urbanisation. Example – Mumbai, Pune, Nasik . In Corridor Development, Mumbai is getting replicated in Pune and Nasik.


Cross- broder corridor

  1. The Maputo Development Corridor between South Africa and Mozambique was initiated in 1995 to rehabilitate the primary infrastructure network along the corridor (road, rail, port, and border posts), attract investment in the corridor’s catchment area

  2. New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) spatial development initiative identified the Bas-Congo development corridor involving Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Republic of Congo as a region where deep integration would have large benefits

  3. In West and East Africa: The Gulf of Guinea development corridor—linking Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, and Togo— could integrate West African economies through transport and energy . It could also connect fi ve large coastal cities with a critical mass of economic activities and administrative service provision: Abidjan, Accra, Cotonou, Lagos, and Lomé.

  4. The Mombasa development corridor— linking the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Sudan, and Uganda – To connect major urban centers.


If we look at all these projects, the main aim is to connect the Main cities and link main cities (coastal cities) with interior markets , increase investment though better infrastructure, greater factor mobility with good transportation, create industries in corridor linking them with exports, increase role of Global finances- IFI, MFI so that large increase in international financial will lead to more economic benefits and raise employment opportunities. To promote inter-related infrastructure and large-scale economic sectoral investments. ‘Densification’ of the corridors through the establishment of ancillary and feeder infrastructure to enlarge the corridor’s catchments area and beneficiaries, ‘Deepening’ of resource industries via resource linkages in industrial clusters

Perspectives about the Urban Spatial Structure: From Dichotomy to Continuum

Conventional perspectives about the urban spatial structure tended to represent the urban space in dichotomy with the rural space. They were considered two separate entities, albeit in interaction. The emerging perspective considers the urban spatial structure as a continuum composed of a variety of transitional structures between what can be considered purely rural and urban. The firsts are villages representing basic forms of urbanism in a rural setting. Then, a whole range of urban settlements ranging from towns to large urban agglomerations. The Extended Metropolitan Region (EMR; often labeled a metropolis) is a continuum of urban activities, often interwoven with rural activities, that includes a large urban agglomeration and a network of secondary (satellite) cities, often structured along a corridor.

Case of Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor- DMIC



Sunday, September 25, 2011

Urban Corridors around the World


URBAN CORRIDORs across the World

1. Central Asia:

the industrial corridor developing in India between Mumbai and Delhi, will stretch over 1500 km

2. South-East Asia

-the manufacturing and service industry corridor in Malaysia’s Kuala Lumpur is
clustered within the Klang Valley

-1500 Km from Beijing to Tokya via POYONGYANG NORTH kOREA AND SEOUL
connects at least 77 cities with populations of 200,000 or more. More than 97 million
people live in this urban corridor, which links four separate megalopolises in four countries, effectively merging them into one

3. Africa:
the greater Ibadan-Lagos-Accra urban corridor - spanning roughly 600 kilometres linking Nigeria, Benin, Togo and Ghana - is the engine of West Africa’s regional economy

Few more Mega Region development

1. China's Hong Kong-Shenzen-Guangzhou mega-region, home to 120 million people
2. JAPAN S Nagoya-Osaka-Kyoto-Kobe, likely to hold 60 million by 2015
3. BRAZIL S São Paulo to Rio de Janeiro mega-region where 43 million people now live


ADVANTAGES


stimulating business, real estate development and land values along their ribbon-like development areas. These corridors are also improving inter-connectivity and creating new forms of interdependence among cities, leading to regional economic development growth.

DISADVANTAGES

However, the disadvantage is that, in some cases, urban corridors can result in a country’s capital being the only city of importance (known as urban primacy). This can result in unbalanced regional development as these capital cities strengthen their ties to existing economic centres (i.e. each other) rather than allowing for more diffused spatial development.

VISION - CONCEPT NOTE ON FEW CORRIDORS

1. DMIC corridor

Document not opening

2. The Nampo-Pyongyang corridor - North Korea
A strategic area for European investment in DPRK

Vision

There are major economic problems affecting the development of North Korean regions.
This corridor recognizes the importance of transport and logistics as key factors in regional economic growth.
Investment opportunity is determined by market size, industrial specializations, accessibility, and infrastructure provision and Government conclude that Nampo-Pyongyang corridor is best suited for investment by European companies and thus this corridor becomes the region for producing and exporting their goods and services.


Water conflicts in BMIC region

Contamination of water (in lakes in the vicinity) was a challenge that the project was facing. NICE had entered into an agreement with Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board
(BWSSB) for use of more than 150 MLD of water which was 1/4
the of the amount of the water supplied to Bangalore city. Thus, the project was expected to adversely affect supply of water to the city. In addition, there were ongoing disputes on the Cauvery river water between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

BMIC was expected to receive 85 MLD of waste water free for non potable use, depriving farmers who used it for various agricultural purposes. This decision was also a region with extensive irrigation network based on the River Cauvery basin.

In January 2008, BWSSB decided not to permit NICE to shift water and sewerage lines into four locations as it could have affected the water supply and sanitation in the city. Shifting of the pipeline was essential for the completion of the alignment in the prevalent form. In spite of repeated request from NICE, the pipelines were not shifted stating technical opinions. On 24 January 2008, the High Court of Karnataka directed the BWSSB to shift the water and sewage pipelines in four locations so that NICE could complete the peripheral road, which was part of the BMIC project.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Alternative Water Allocation Mechanisms

Alternative Water Allocation Mechanisms

__________________________________________
Alternative Water Allocation Mechanisms: Indian and International Experiences
Author(s): Ruth Meinzen-Dick and Meyra Mendoza
Source: Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31, No. 13 (Mar. 30, 1996), pp. A25
___________________________________________

1. India has vast water resources, but is not equally shared among regions irregular distribution of rainfall. Irrigation thus play a critical role in Indian agriculture. Now increasing trend is usage of groundwater resources

2. However, growing population and urbanisation, are putting pressures on transfer of water out of agriculture
In Urban center, the poor face a lot of problems and often end up paying high prices for domestic water supplies.
In nearby rural areas the problem is still more acute. They poor rural people many a times will not have access to potable water and sanitation services, and pollutants from disposal of untreated sewage and poor sanitation are becoming add to problem.

3. Now with growing industries , the demand for water has gone up and If Industries exists in rural areas then they polluted the water sources and water becomes unfit for consumption purposes.

Therefore , there are competing sectors for allocation (or transfer) of water and also one needs to address the problem of the degradation of the water resource base

This paper argues that - greater attention to the allocation of water ( water rights and decisions on when, how, and where water will be delivered).
Holistically deal with decisions on the use of water in different sectors, and a greater importance on Water rights and incentives of water users

ALTERNATIVE WATER ALLOCATION MECHANISMS


Three types of alternative water allocation mechanisms:
(a) administrative allocation,
(b) user-managed allocation
(c) market allocation




Monday, September 19, 2011

Theoretical Arguments for New forms of Urbanisation

Theoretical Arguments for New forms of Urbanisation

_____________________________________________________________

References

1.David Harvey, “Limits on Capital”
2.David Harvey, “MEGACITIES LECTURE 4”
3.David Harvey, “A Brief History of Neoliberalism” (2005)
4.David Harvey, “Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development” (2006)
5.Saskia Sassen, “Locating cities on global circuits”
6.Saskia Sassen, “Cities in a world economy”
7.Henry Lefebvre, “The Production of Space”
8.Neil Brenner, “The Urbanisation of Neoliberalism: Theoretical debates”
9.Manuel Castells, “The Urban Question. A Marxist Approach”
10.MICHAEL GOLDMAN, "Speculative Urbanism and the Making of the Next World City"

_____________________________________________________________

New types of development in the peri-urban peripheryFramework: The four criteria's are ( Harvey, D: 2006)1. The material embedding of capital accumulation process in the web ofsocio-ecological life- leads to more urbanization and geographical development reflects the different ways in which different social groups have materiallyembedded their modes of society into the web of socio-ecological life2. Accumulation by dispossession- Capital surplus is absorbed through geographical expansions Leads to uneven-geographical development through long term debt andfinanced capital investment embedded in land3. The law- like character of capital accumulation in space and timeconversion of NA land a much simpler process4. Political, social and class struggles at a variety of geographical scales.
_____________________________________________________________

Theoretical Framework of GOLDMAN article1. State is initiating a set of dynamics to convert rural land by integrating it into world class city and global economy and this puts the majority of people under a type of rule of law which is described by author as ‘state of exception’.2. ‘Conversion’ of the rural into the urban affects the class and community relations, social and economic relations, and has lead to new forms of industrialization (say IT) and urbanization (say world class cities). 3. These are new modes of spatial and social production changes the role of the State and thus creates a ‘speculative government’ in cities with exceptional rules of dispossession. 4. This leads to redefining state relations, urban citizenship, rights and rules of access.
_____________________________________________________________

Firstly, the author argues that ‘transnational policy networks’, the International Financial Institutions and other International agencies are influencing the making and implementing new projects in Bangalore.

Second, the role of old bureaucracy is replaced by powerful ‘parastatal’ agencies and is helping to bring about new land acquisition under ‘eminent domain’ for the public good and thus leads to converting the rural lands to urban periphery which he describes it as “informal everyday practices of land encroachment, lower-class people’s dispossession”. Sassen talks about the 'unbundling of the State'. Few activities of the State are diminished and few other activities are enhanced such as replacing the old bureaucracy with ‘parastatal’ agencies, signing of International treaties with UN, ILO, IMF, WTO and many more and she describes this as process of 'Rescaling'. Therefore new institutional arrangements (parastatal agencies) are constantly being constituted in response to circumstances of material embedding of capital circulation and State also creates laws such as ownership of private property of land, individual judicial rights over the land etc to promote this kind of urbanization. (Sassen)

Third, author argues that certain new forms of capital investment and their relations have emerged in Bangalore and these are linked to other urban centres which are very similar to transformations occurring in other cities across Asia with world-city ambitions. He also says that there is active politics over land speculation and active dispossession and in the process the leads to ill- paid labour which has an effect on their jobs, identities and communities and author argues that this is highly speculative and living in Bangalore is itself become very dangerous .
David Harvey argues that capital moves in circuits and looks are new markets for investment in first circuit. In the Second circuit this surplus capital is invested in some tangible assets such as land so that more surplus and profits are made. Harvey also talks about the Historical- Geographical- Materialism where historical gives the temporal unfolding, geographical gives an idea of spatial order which defines private property, boundary of State and material embedding. Thus the material embedding of capital accumulation process leads to more urbanization and geographical development which reflect the different ways in which different social groups have materially embedded their modes of society into the web of socio-ecological life. Capital accumulation has to be transformed into material such as land and thus shapes land pattern.( Harvey: 2006 )This process is dynamic and is evolving and one can see linkages between theoretical concepts and practical experiences in Bangalore.

The Author then traces the history of growth of industries such as Public-sector companies in Bangalore and the role of State in promoting these industries and gives the dynamics of housing, type of labor employed and changing land pattern due to growth of these industries. However, he argues that until mid-1990's Bangalore didn’t face major problems , but after that one can observe ‘mega-city problems’ with characteristics of social inequality, mass displacement and dispossession, growth of slums, violence among caste and religious groups and epidemic public health crises due to severe water supply and sewage problems, traffic problems and air pollution etc. The author also argues that there are coalitions among the private corporations such as NASSCOM, CII, NRIs etc and they help to connect globally so that capital circulates globally and gives examples as how that State at all levels Central, State, Local level intervenes and creates a conducive environment for capital to move.
David Harvey argues that In Neo-liberal era , where the private players look for new investment areas for greater profits by adopting new and superior technologies such as investing in new transport networks which requires new lands and thus promotes new urbanization . Thus the space- time dimension of urbanization is changing rapidly due to superior transport and communication facilities. Physical investments in land are very important for newer investment in production and consumption. Any spatial arrangements achieved under one set of transport and communication such as rail roads and telegraph will have to be changed to meet the conditions of any new set such as air transport and Internet has lead to evolving inequality of geography of land and territorial division of labor and creates contradictions in the way capital embeddes itself and thus one can draw similarities in the theoretical concepts of David Harvey and practical experiences in Bangalore as described by the author.( Harvey: 2006 )

_______________________________________________________


Manuel Castel's Analytical framework gives five components which can be traced to this article. First, Economy expressed in Space- At different period’s different economy exists. Before 1990's the economy of Bangalore was mainly constituted of Public Sector enterprises, but this changed to IT industry and services after 1990's. Bangalore also had Manufacturing centres but most of them have now shifted to tier-II cities such as Hosur and thus a hierarchy of cities is formed. Place becomes secondary and communication and technology become primary.

Second, Collective consumption- capitalist mode of production in urban could not be located in the sphere of production, but it had to be in the sphere of reproduction of labour power. Reproductive capacity of labor which included food, wages for production become important part of labour compensation. Since large quantities of labour are needed, they all are collective consumers and State plays an active role in bringing about collective consumption. Therefore due to these reasons many employees/ workers/ labourers came and settled in Bangalore and increases the stress on providing basic services, infrastructure etc and this leads to contradictions. Example: Who has access to water and who does not?. Since Water Supply Board (BWSSB) has limited water to supply to Bangalore and thus those who can't afford to pay or those who are illegal ( not recognised by State) are excluded from the water provision and this could lead to class struggles against the ruling powers.

Third, Exchange- Market is facilitated by space. There is a continuous modification, multiplication, innovation, change in the way markets are functioning in Bangalore. The author doesn't talk much about these.Fourth, Institution- The author argues in detail that Government in Bangalore is very speculative. Three significant institutional shifts have occurred in the governance arena in Bangalore

First, Author talks about the role of IFI and their hidden agenda and Central Government's scheme of JNNURM and its attached conditionality of reforms have changed the type of institutional structure in governance. Logic of decentralisation is not to have layers of Governance structures above it but by enhancing the local government’s role the Global and National Agenda of Neo-liberalism can be unleashed. ( Sassen) . Therefore with these institutional changes offered to attract new capital and this also created unequal geographical developments such as growth of SEZ in IT sectors etc ( Castels, Harvey: 2006).

Second, author gives a perspective on expert commissions and task forces that have been set up since 1999 which played a critical role as an institutional apparatus that could ‘meet demands that the present system of elected corporations does not adequately fulfil’. The argument was that this would enhance citizen role and they could take informed and effective decisions. Therefore setting up of Bangalore Agenda Task Force (BATF) with representation from IT, BT sectors , NGOs, business community and ‘ABIDe Bengaluru' created a trend of giving elite corporate and citizen leaders the power of decision-making and in the process circumventing existing forms of government decision-making.

Third, The Role of Institution of citizen action groups such as Janaagraha and Public Affairs Centre (PAC) led by ex-IFI and Wall Street professionals is given more prominence in the government agencies by introducing new concepts such as citizen’s report card which have made their way into JNNURM.
Thus the author argues that with these institutional changes such as decentralization and local empowerment, the Governance is weakened and this have not led to democratization but rather it is undermined and voluntarism and civil-society participation have temporarily triumphed.

The author then argues that the farmers in rural areas are not able to produce to maximum limit and whatever they produce is not enough and many of these rural farmers have small land holdings with the reference to BMIC project. One can trace this to Safa argument, that there are large processes of rural subsistence. Therefore there is large distress among the farmers with very less profits , however large number of them are still employed in farming and this is not similar to freeing to labour. (Safa) . Since the State is not a homogenous entity, there are places to intervene and one can work through these contradictions ( Castels) and thus these rural farmers with small land holdings with the help of NGOs started a struggles against land acquisition and later on they also filed a case in High Court.

Safa also gives the characteristics of urbanisation is the presence of huge informal economy where most of the urban and rural population is employed in multi-faceted ‘informal’ economy with occupation ranging from textiles, apparels, silk processing, mechanical fabrication, floriculture, food processing etc which employs most of the population and generates between 55 and 75% of Bangalore’s GDP. However the world-city projects such as BIA, BMIC, IT corridor etc are seen as positive for the growth of city and its economy and has greater political backing while neglecting this huge diverse informal sector.

Author argues that reason for conversion of agricultural land to urban non agricultural land is that the Markets view these agricultural land in the fringes of the city are 'dead capital' buried within unproductive public and poor-people’s landscapes and State is actively involved in such activities and quotes examples of reports of land grabbing of senior government and party officials and this money is used for political party funds. Author also argues that State which owned large tracks now and before, however before 1980s State earned their incomes from rent collection and maintenance fees; but now in stark contrast, state agents earn their incomes by turning public goods into real estate, and these real estate has become highly remunerative largely due to branding of Bangalore as 'World Class City'.

With the rise of IT sector trends in land-use patterns have changed drastically. IT’s main investment is in real estate. As Global competition enhances these IT companies tend to invest their surplus in land because of it lucrative returns (more than IT revenue itself) . Therefore converting undervalued public or community land or private land into real estate ensures that IT companies are globally competitive. Land values in the recent times have skyrocketed anywhere between 160% - 200% between 2001 and 2006 and cites the case of Infosys and Satyam . The author argues that reasons for these are First, most of foreign IT firms no longer purchase land for their own campuses but are leasing other ones and earn profit and they are also government initiatives and subsidies given to IT companies to attract them to Bangalore.

Second, the number of SEZ applications for IT office parks is increasing which implies that more public money, land and resources are being channelized into these IT firms to offset the start-up maintenance costs.

Sustainable Livelihood in Water Sector

Sustainable Livelihood in Water Sector
_______________________________________________________________
Paper: The Rural Water Livelihoods Index
Caroline A. Sullivan*, Alasdair Cohen**, Jean-Marc Faurès** & Guido Santini**
FAO
_______________________________________________________________

A focus on wider water supply-livelihood linkages, e.g. through impacts on household labour and income generation, would lead to changes in the way water supply activities are conceived and implemented.
The purpose of the Rural Water Livelihoods Index (RWLI) is to provide a framework for assessment of water-related components which influence rural livelihoods, and can support rural poverty reduction.(lack of access of capital and result of deprivation these resources(Sen))
In terms of structure, the RWLI (Rural Water Livelihoods Index (RWLI))addresses four key aspects of rural livelihoods. These are:

1. Access to basic water services: Access to basic water
services includes access to clean and affordable water supply and to adequate sanitation.

2. Crop and livestock water security: Crop and livestock water security
is a measure of how agricultural activities are affected by climate variability and how resilient agricultural systems are to such variability, including droughts and floods. It is linked, in part, and where needed, with access to irrigation and livestock watering facilities.

3. Clean and healthy water environment: Clean and healthy water environment represents the water quality component of the index, in relation to human health and living conditions

4. Secure and equitable water entitlement: secure and equitable water entitlements are related to access to water, rights, and the degree to which the rule of law is present and equitably enforced.